Integrating Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to Monitor Educational Infrastructure and Social Transformation in Afghanistan (2020–2025)
DOI:
10.56566/mandalika.v4i1.650Downloads
Abstract
Monitoring educational infrastructure in conflict-affected countries such as Afghanistan remains critical for understanding social transformation and guiding evidence-based policy. Indeed, rather vital. This study develops an integrated Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) framework to analyze the spatial distribution, growth, and accessibility of educational facilities in Afghanistan between 2020 and 2025. Multi-temporal satellite imagery from Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8/9 was combined with socio-economic datasets, including population density, poverty indicators, and official school records, to map schools and madrasahs, assess accessibility, and identify infrastructure scarcity hotspots (what is more, the combination yielded quite robust results). Accessibility analyses employing urban and rural buffer zones revealed significant disparities, with rural populations facing markedly limited physical access and correspondingly higher educational deprivation. Quite stark, in fact. Multi-criteria hotspot modelling further highlighted those regions where high population demand converges with poor facility quality and teacher shortages, thereby indicating critical service gaps. For that matter, these gaps persist rather stubbornly. Comparative analysis of infrastructure growth versus population expansion demonstrated, quite convincingly, that in many urban and rural areas new school construction has not fully matched demographic demand, thus revealing unmet educational needs. The study emphasises that spatially explicit, data-driven approaches are essential for equitable educational planning and for supporting social transformation in fragile contexts. The findings provide actionable insights for policymakers, international donors, and planners to prioritise interventions in underserved regions and promote inclusive educational development. Future research could usefully integrate real-time geospatial monitoring and participatory approaches to further enhance educational planning and social development strategies.
Keywords:
Accessibility Analysis Afghanistan Educational Infrastructure Geographic Information Systems Remote SensingReferences
Al-Haddad, R. E., & Rakshit, P. V. (2023). Finding home: Participatory geospatial mapping with Rohingya refugees. Applied Geography, 161, Article 103136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103136
Alonso-Cañas, I., & Chuvieco, E. (2015). Global burned area mapping from ENVISAT-MERIS and MODIS active fire data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 163, 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.011
Amos, C., Petropoulos, G. P., & Ferentinos, K. P. (2019). Determining the use of Sentinel-2A MSI for wildfire burning and severity detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(4), 905–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1519284
Atkinson, P. M., & Tate, S. J. (2023). Advances in remote sensing and geospatial technologies for humanitarian action. Cambridge University Press.
Atmaja, T., Setiawati, M. D., Kurisu, K., & Fukushi, K. (2024). Advancing coastal flood risk prediction utilizing a GeoAI approach by considering mangroves as an Eco-DRR strategy. Hydrology, 11(12), Article 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11120198
Aung, T. S. (2021). Satellite analysis of the environmental impacts of armed conflict in Rakhine, Myanmar. Science of the Total Environment, 781, Article 146758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146758
Avtar, R., Aggarwal, R., Kharrazi, A., Kumar, P., & Kurniawan, T. A. (2019). Utilizing geospatial information to implement Sustainable Development Goals and monitor their progress. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(1), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7996-9
Bachmann, N., Tripathi, S., Brunner, M., & Jodlbauer, H. (2022). The contribution of data-driven technologies in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 14(5), Article 2497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052497
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Burke, M., Driscoll, A., Lobell, D. B., & Ermon, S. (2020). Using satellite imagery to understand and promote sustainable development. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.06988
Chirici, G. (2021). Earth observation for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goals: The role of the European Journal of Remote Sensing. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 54(Suppl. 2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2020.1756119
Govindarajan, R. S., & Prajapati, M. K. (2022). Integration of remote sensing, GIS and survey data for infrastructure monitoring in developing regions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (pp. 4220–4223). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS46834.2022.9898874
Guo, H., Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2021). Assessing educational accessibility in urban and rural settings using multi-criteria GIS analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, Article 103226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103226
Hekmat, H., Ahmad, T., Singh, S. K., Kanga, S., Meraj, G., & Kumar, P. (2023). Land use and land cover changes in Kabul, Afghanistan focusing on the drivers impacting urban dynamics during five decades (1973–2020). Geomatics, 3(3), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics3030024
Lemenkova, P. (2025). Geo-information for humanitarian mapping and monitoring crisis-affected regions: A scoping review. Journal of Migration and Political Studies, 3(2), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.69510/mipos.1684741
Li, W., Wang, X., & Wang, Q. (2020). A review of global human settlement mapping using remote sensing. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 92, Article 102194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102194
Liu, X., Wang, S., Huang, H., & Wen, L. (2020). Spatial accessibility analysis of public services based on GIS techniques: A review. Transactions in GIS, 24(3), 737–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12601
Madushani, J. A. T., Withanage, N. C., Mishra, P. K., Meraj, G., Kibebe, C. G., & Kumar, P. (2025). Thematic and bibliometric review of remote sensing and GIS-based flood disaster studies in South Asia during 2004–2024. Sustainability, 17(1), Article 217. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010217
Mehta, A. (2025). How GIS data can transform government operations. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(6), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.72
Nabizada, M. J., Rousta, I., Elzein, A., & Olafsson, H. (2025). Evaluation of spatial distribution and temporal trend of nitrogen dioxide pollution using Sentinel-5P satellite imagery over Afghanistan based on Google Earth Engine. Earth Science Informatics, 18, Article 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01644-5
Nagler, S., Neteler, M. R., & Stefanov, W. L. (2021). Mapping historical urbanization dynamics with open remote sensing data and machine learning. Remote Sensing, 13(19), Article 3845. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193845
Pavlovskaya, M. (2018). Critical GIS as a tool for social transformation. The Canadian Geographer, 62(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12438
Persello, C., Wegner, J. D., Hänsch, R., Tuia, D., Ghamisi, P., Koeva, M., & Camps-Valls, G. (2022). Deep learning and earth observation to support the Sustainable Development Goals: Current approaches, open challenges, and future opportunities. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 10(2), 172–200. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2021.3136100
Petropoulos, C. G., & Stylios, G. P. (2020). Enhancing spatial inclusion through participatory GIS. Journal of Spatial Science, 65(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2020.1744780
Reyers, B., Stafford-Smith, M., Erb, K. H., Scholes, R. J., & Selomane, O. (2017). Essential variables help to focus Sustainable Development Goals monitoring. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.003
Ruuhulhaq, M. S. (2024). The role of remote sensing and GIS in sustainable development and national resilience. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 12(4), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v12i4.966
See, L. J., & Bright, M. F. (2021). A systematic review of participatory GIS and community mapping evidence for resilience and equity. Progress in Human Geography, 45(4), 680–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520943739
Yang, Y., Wei, D., & Duan, H. (2022). Machine learning in spatial accessibility and infrastructure equity assessment: A review. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 91, Article 101708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101708
Zhu, M., Wang, K., Li, J., & Li, Y. (2022). Deep learning with multisource remote sensing data for infrastructure change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60(1), Article 2001507. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3097564
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Omid Tarashtwal, Mohammad Nawab Turan, Abdul Wali Sirat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
