Impact of Influenced Online Reviews and User-Generated Content on Customer Satisfaction Perception in E-Commerce Consumers
DOI:
10.56566/mandalika.v4i1.434Downloads
Abstract
In today’s digital marketplace, online reviews, and user-generated content have become powerful influences on consumer behaviour, particularly in the e-commerce sector. This study explores how online reviews, customer testimonials, product ratings, images, and videos shared by users affect customer satisfaction perception among e-commerce consumers. As consumers increasingly rely on the opinions and experiences of others before making a purchase, understanding the role of these digital inputs is critical for businesses aiming to improve customer satisfaction.
The research is based on a Quantitative Methods to survey responses from 300 e-commerce users with insights through Google Forms. The results indicate that the clarity, authenticity, and helpfulness of online reviews significantly impact how consumers perceive the quality of products and services. Additionally, user-generated images and videos increase buyer confidence and satisfaction by offering real-world evidence of product performance.
The study highlights the importance for e-commerce platforms to actively encourage and manage customer feedback and content sharing. Businesses that promote transparent and engaging user content can enhance consumer trust, improve satisfaction levels, and reduce purchase hesitation. These findings offer practical value to marketers and platform designers seeking to strengthen the online shopping experience.
Keywords:
Consumer Behavior Customer Satisfaction Digital Marketing E-Commerce Online Reviews Purchase Decision User-Generated ContentReferences
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075
Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407–1424. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308
Park, D. H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415110405
Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20090
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407–1424. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308
Filieri, R. (2015). What makes an online consumer review trustworthy? Internet Research, 25(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-05-2013-0095
Ho, C. H., & Lee, Y. L. (2007). The development of an e-travel service quality scale. Tourism Management, 28(6), 1434–1449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.12.002
Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). The effect of electronic word of mouth communications on intention to buy: A meta-analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 22, 1203–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09924-y
Liu, Y., Karahanna, E., & Watson, R. T. (2011). Unveiling user-generated content: Designing websites to best present customer reviews. Business Horizons, 54(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.006
Muchnik, L., Aral, S., & Taylor, S. J. (2013). Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science, 341(6146), 647–651. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240466
Park, D. H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of online consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415110405
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.
Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20090
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G., & Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.011
License
Copyright (c) 2026 P Sasikumar, T. M. Hemalatha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
