Development of Assessment Instruments to Measure Collaboration and Responsibility Skills of Students in Physics Learning on Cased Method-Based

Undang Rosidin (1), Feriansyah Sesunan (2), Della Fitria (3)
(1) University of Mataram, Indonesia,
(2) University of Mataram, Indonesia,
(3) Student, Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to develop an assessment instrument to measure student collaboration and responsibility skills in the context of case-based physics learning that is valid, reliable, and practical. This type of research is called research development (R&D) using the 7 stages adapted from (Borg & Gall, 1989). Product validation was carried out to assess aspects of construction, substance, and language. The results of expert validation of the assessment instrument to measure collaboration and responsibility skills were 88.72% and 85.43%, with very valid criteria. Then, this assessment instrument was tested on 30 students and analyzed using the Rasch model. Based on the results of the test data analysis, we obtained that: (1) 14 items of the collaboration instrument and 9 items of the responsibility instrument were declared valid; (2) the reliability of the collaboration and responsibility skills assessment instrument was 0.82 and 0.71 with perfect and good criteria; and (3) the average value of the practicality test of the collaboration and responsibility skills assessment instrument was 90.72% and 91.80% with very high criteria.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Anggraheni, N. N., Sriyono, & Ngazizah, N. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Untuk Mengukur Sikap Sosial Peserta Didik Sma Kelas X Pada Pembelajaran Fisika. RADIASI: Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 1–6.

Arifin, Z. (2014). Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria Instrumen dalam Suatu Penelitian. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 2(1), 28–36.

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Science. Springer.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research: An Introduction (5th ed). Longman.

Haryati, H. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Kompetensi Pada Praktikum Pemrograman Web Di SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36232/pendidikan.v6i2.33

Hermawan, H., Siahaan, P., Suhendi, E., Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., Setyadin, A. H., & Hidayat, S. R. (2017). Desain Instrumen Rubrik Kemampuan Berkolaborasi Siswa SMP dalam Materi Pemantulan Cahaya. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03207

Hodri, & Rijanto, T. (2013). Pembangan Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Smk Pada Mata Pelajaran Dasar Dan Pengukuran Listrik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro 5(3):1053–1060.

Kim, S., Phillips, R., Pinsky, L., Brock, D., Phillips, K., & Keary, J. (2006). Medical Education.

Kurniawan, H. (2020). Pembelajaran Era 4.0: Integrasi Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter, Keterampilan Abad 21, HOTS, dan Literasi dalam Perspektif Merdeka Belajar. Media Akademi.

Kurniawati, D., & Mawardi, M. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Gotong Royong dalam Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 640–648. https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/387

Lickona, T. (2015). Mendidik untuk Membentuk Karakter. Bagaimana Sekolah dapat Mengajarkan Sikap Hormat dan Tanggung Jawab: Diterjemahkan oleh Juma Abdu Wamaungo. Bumi Aksara.

Riduwan. (2012). Cara Mudah Menggunakan dan Memaknai Path Analysis (Analisis Jalur). Alfabeta.

Rosidin, U. (2017). Evaluasi dan Asesmen Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Akademi.

Rusman. (2018). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Di Sekolah Dasar Studi Tentang Best Practice yang Dilakukan Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Perencanaan, Pelaksanaan, dan Penilaian Kurikulum 2013. Al-Bidayah 2: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 2(10), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v10i2.166

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. Tim komunikata.

Suparmin, Bakar, U. A., Giyoto, & Fauzi, A. (2012). Validitas, Reliabilitas dan Kepraktisan Ujian. Kodifikasi: Institue Agama Islam (IAIN) Surakarta., 6(1), 65–76.

Suwandi, S. (2021). FEB Gelar Workshop RPS, Bahas Pembelajaran Berbasis Case Method – Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Syam, R., Winarno, H., & T., P. (2018). Analisis Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 oleh Guru Mata Pelajaran Produktif di SMK Negeri 5 Bantaeng. Pendidikan, 3(1), 1–11. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/11041/1/2. JURNAL.pdf

Verawati, Y., Supriatna, A., Wahyu, W., & Setiaji, B. (2020). Identification of student’s collaborative skills in learning salt hydrolysis through sharing and jumping task design. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042058

Viyanti, Rosidin, U., & Shintya, R. E. (2022). PROJECT-BASED PHYSICS LEARNING. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 96–108. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v5i1.11636

Wardani, D. A., Rosidin, U., & Rochmiyati. (2021). Development of Assessment Instruments in Project-Based Learning to Measure Collaboration Skills and Compassion for Students in Elementary School. The International Journal of Social Science World, 3(1), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5044958#.YWA5UDI3KA0.mendeley

Wijayanti, E., & Mundilarto. (2015). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Diri dan Teman Sejawat Kompetensi Bidang Studi pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i2.5572

Yusuf, M. A. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif & Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Prenada Media

Authors

Undang Rosidin
Feriansyah Sesunan
Della Fitria
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
Rosidin, U., Sesunan, F., & Fitria, D. (2022). Development of Assessment Instruments to Measure Collaboration and Responsibility Skills of Students in Physics Learning on Cased Method-Based. AMPLITUDO : Journal of Science and Technology Innovation, 1(2), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.56566/amplitudo.v1i2.7

Article Details